Blogger recently added the feature of uploading video directly into these posts. So I thought I would test it out with an older, low-res, yet still incredibly delicious chicken recipe I previously posted using the standard YouTube embed. I'm curious if there is a big difference in quality. The other obvious advantage is I could post videos that would only be available to visitors of this blog, since I could avoid the need to upload to video sharing sites first, just to get the flash embed code.
If you have no idea what I'm talking about, don't feel bad, I'm not that sure either. Anyway, we are basically comparing the two clips. Any and all input is welcome, especially from tech nerds.
Here is the blogger video upload of The "Ultimate" Roast Chicken at same size as the YouTube version:
Here is the regular YouTube flash embed of the same clip:
Here is the blogger video upload of The "Ultimate" Roast Chicken:
Well, so what do you think?